Darren Sammy is a sensible choice to lead West Indies’ next generation

West Indies' New Captain

Once upon a time the news proclaiming the appointment of a new captain of the West Indies would be a world event, but the low-key greeting given to the announcement of Darren Sammy as captain, told a story both how far the West Indies have fallen and about Sammy himself.

Some all-time greats of world cricket have inhabited the role down the years, and in that respect Sammy fails to match up-though few would.

But Sammy is an intriguing choice as skipper, he has never been a Test regular and his stats suggest he is far from the West Indies’ best player. But if that was the criteria for captaincy then Chris Gayle would have retained the captaincy or Dwayne Bravo could have inherited the role.

Yet their status as the team’s leading players has also caused its own problems, with both involved in disputes with the WICB which has ultimately cost them both their claims for the captaincy as well as Dinesh Ramdin and Jerome Taylor.

Of the remaining candidates Sammy is the standout choice; both as a committed and passionate player for the West Indies but also an experienced captain with the Leeward Islands. These qualities will be important as he leads a younger generation of West Indian cricketers forward.

But it also lays down a marker for the younger players to follow. Sammy’s commitment to the West Indies’ will be total, could either Bravo or Gayle who have both embroiled themselves in rows with their board and are IPL-contracted.

Gayle axed

The potential for further trouble down the line is not what the West Indies need as they look to rebuild with younger players like Adrian Barath and Kemar Roach.

A stable structure and leadership, after years of captaincy ruled as much by a player’s status more than a coherent strategy, is what is desired and it is precisely this ideal which has led the West Indies to Sammy, who of all the remaining candidates has the most captaincy experience-gained with the Windward Islands-and international experience.

The experience with the Windward Islands is key because unlike recent captains like Brian Lara and Gayle, Sammy has regular experience of captaincy and can lead with imagination and confidence, not to mention provide leadership of a team which have badly missed it as their fortunes have stuttered.

But he also has experience captaining a young team with some success. The Windward Islands are traditionally one of the smallest and unsuccessful teams in the Caribbean, but under Sammy’s captaincy, a number of their players have developed into international cricketers.

Recent graduates include Shane Shillingford, Andre Fletcher and Nelon Pascal who have all been involved in West Indies teams in the past year, though Fletcher is missing from the squad in Sri Lanka.

Nelon Pascal and Andre Fletcher have thrived under Sammy for the Windward Islands

It is these qualities which make the appointment of Sammy a sensible one for the West Indies.

He fits the profile as a safe candidate whose attentions will be focussed solely on improving his team’s fortunes, boasts significant captaincy experience and has also dealt with younger players who make a significant part of this West Indies squad.

The key for both the West Indies and for Sammy is that they are patient in their expectations of this captaincy, as tangible change or even progress will take time to be achieved after years of regression.

The West Indies’ potential for success and producing talented cricketers capable of impacting on the world stage remains in place, yet they have not had the stable environment to help these players develop.

Results may not come immediately, and this is the vital point for any plans in the future, but the selectors must trust their decision and back Sammy. His appointment may lack sparkle compared to his illustrious predecessors but in the circumstances it could turn out to be the sensible choice.

Eight points for Australia to move forward after India series

These are unprecedented times for Ricky Ponting and Australia, now removed from top spot in the ICC rankings and deposited into fifth place and with plenty to ponder after India inflicted a third consecutive Test defeat after their loss against Pakistan in England.

Now, with a home Ashes series to ponder, Ponting and his team find themselves under increasing scrutiny, as Australia attempt to work out where things have gone wrong and what can be put right.

Now with a potentially big 12 months coming up for Australia with an Ashes series and a World Cup to defend, there is plenty of work ahead for Australia to do if they are to get back on track.

New Blood for a New Middle Order

Loyalty can be a good thing in a captain and coach, especially when things pay off and a batsman makes runs, yet it can also be a weakness which hinders change when it is most needed. Whatever Ponting and Tim Nielsen say about their batting, change must be considered.

The prime candidates for the chop are Mike Hussey and Marcus North, who despite scoring a brilliant backs-to-the-wall hundred in India scored only 13 as an aggregate from his three other innings.

But who can replace these two? They could start with Usman Khawaja, the 23-year old New South Wales batsman who got his season off to a flyer with a double hundred against South Australia, or even the recovering Callum Ferguson, who is getting his career started after injury or even Mike’s brother David Hussey, who has scored runs for fun against all attacks yet has never been given an opportunity at the highest level.

If not revolution, then revamp

The likelihood for change in the interim period before the Ashes is unlikely with such a key contest coming up but if Australia want to get their batsmen firing in the Ashes then the best thing they could consider is tinkering with their batting line-up as much as the batsmen.

Ponting’s place at number 3 has been secure for years, yet there are signs of aging-despite him being the standout middle order batsman in India. The assuredness of his run scoring has gone, and the certainty about which he would convert starts into big scores. Having seen Sachin Tendulkar hit prime form at number 4, Ponting could follow suit and position himself further down the order.

Michael Clarke could drop down to 5, a more natural position for a player whose technique seems a touch loose for number 4, and Mike Hussey, a former opener and someone more at home against the faster bowlers than the spinners at the moment, could come in at 3.

Who is leading this attack?

The phrase “leader of the bowling attack” seems to be a modern one, designed for people like Richard Hadlee and Allan Donald, who once would carry their attacks to the opposition. Yet there is some sense in having a stand-out figurehead bowler, England have one in James Anderson, South Africa in Dale Steyn and India in Zaheer Khan. So who is Australia’s?

The obvious answer is Mitchell Johnson, yet when he has blown distinctly hot and cold over the past 12 months and provides little of the consistency which Australia need. A far better candidate could be the durable and reliable Ben Hilfenhaus, who performed out of his skin in India and could well have a big part to play in the Ashes to come.

Pick the best all-round spinner, not the best one

Steven Smith is not, nor will he ever be, Shane Warne. That much is clear but he should still be picked above Nathan Hauritz. Hauritz is a decent, honest spinner and he has exceeded expectations since his international career.

Yet the question is more if Hauritz is at best a decent spinner, then why trade off his marginally superior ability as a bowler for the better all-round package which Smith offers?

Smith scores runs and could provide plenty of ballast for the middle order, while also bowling tidy leg spin and as the younger man he can well develop into a better spinner than Hauritz. Australia’s spin-bowling cupboard is bare, so why not choose your spinner not only on their ability as a spinner but as an all-round package to compensate? In which case the answer is Steven Smith plain and simple.

Stick with the captain

Talk of removing Ponting as captain continually resurfaces, recently voiced by Geoff Lawson, yet such talk is bunk. For all the weaknesses Ponting has as a tactician, he leads by example and remains the outstanding candidate. Talk of change is ludicrous, especially given that there are no candidates who standout.

Who could replace him? Michael Clarke? Struggling with form and desperately needing to get runs. Simon Katich? An elder statesman yes, but a long-term candidate for change he certainly isn’t. Beyond that there are little choices available, stick with Ricky, his career proves he has a habit of having his own way in the end.

Free Up Michael Clarke

Don’t burden one of your trump batsmen with a tag such as Captain in waiting. The T20 captaincy has exposed flaws in his batting and has hardly helped the team, with Clarke’s inability to clear the boundary and score at the required rate costing his team and clearly harming him.

An idea? Give up the T20 captaincy and pass it to Cameron White. Ceding the captaincy has hardly cost Ponting, nor has the idea of a dual partnership hurt England. Clarke could eventually succeed Ponting though he needs to be scoring runs to justify it. The best way to do that? Strip him of burdens, let him settle into his run scoring and then eventually grow organically into the role.

Prepare an Exit Strategy

Big changes will come in Australian cricket over the coming years with an aging middle order and a captain in his mid 30’s preparing to move. The key to how Australia manage could well be how they cope with the changes-especially given the manner in which they have struggled to stem the fall following the departure of their last generation.

Identify the key players who could well be international players such as Steven Smith, Josh Hazlewood and Peter George plus the likes of Khawaja, Ferguson and Phil Hughes, and grant them opportunities whenever you can. It’ll stand them and Australia in good stead when the time eventually comes for them to step up.

Don’t Panic!

Are Australia finished? No, of course not and to think otherwise is ludicrous. A fall in the rankings is a mere blow, but matters little in the long run. The depth of cricketing talent in Australia are perhaps not as strong as they were in the late 90s, but there is a rich heritage of developing promising players quickly and bouncing back in adversity.

They have this to fall back on, and they must know that whatever the humiliation of being reduced to number 5 in the world it is only temporary. A victory in the Ashes against England could help ease the pain.

If Australia can keep their heads, and put in place the right long-term plans to build again, they could turn this bad moment into a defining one.

Pack mentality allows England’s bowlers to thrive in hunt against Pakistan

As Pakistan subsided to their lowest score in a Test Match against England, the sense of inevitability about it all was rather depressing.

Like they had in the series against Australia and at Trent Bridge the Pakistan batting line-up collapsed like a house of cards. Once the opener’s go, no-one has the application necessary to hold out against the swinging ball.

The steady stream of outside edges which flew to the England close fielders were mere catching practice for a slip cordon who are steadily growing into one of the finest in the world under the tutelage of Richard Halsall.

Yet while the inadequacies of the Pakistan batsmen have been the subject of plenty of column inches and TV coverage, credit where credit is due to the England bowlers.

In these conditions these bowlers are in their element, led by James Anderson who is arguably bowling as well as he ever has.

Certainly yesterday with both in and outswing he was too much for the beleaguered batsmen, as his career test bowling average now stands at it’s lowest point since 2003 after picking up 4-20 on the back of his 11 match haul at Trent Bridge.

But while Anderson’s performances in these elements are fast becoming expected, the form of his two young sidekicks Broad and Finn are further reasons for optimism.

Broad in particular bowled his best spell in England since his series defining 5-37 against Australia, picking up 4-38 with a wonderfully spell of line and length bowling, no doubt remembering his recent 11 wicket haul for Nottinghamshire at this ground.

And then there was Finn, though the junior figure in terms of experience and figures of 2-10, his obvious qualities of immaculate line and length, good pace and height suggest that should he stay fit he can be an England Test bowler for many years to come.

Few bowlers can have caused such a stir so quickly, though bigger tests in Australia will lie ahead.

The exciting prospect for England is that Finn does not appear to shy away from any challenge. Plus a healthy sense of common sense, perhaps drummed into him by his mentor Angus Fraser, will not go amiss on the flat pitches of Australia if they are not needed in conditions such as those at Edgbaston yesterday.

Perhaps the key point for this England bowling attack though lies not in the wickets, but the performances together. The last England attack to operate as a unit were that wonderful attack in 2005, and the signs are that a similar rapport is being built up between the three quick bowlers and Graeme Swann in support.

Plus the different ingredients, Anderson with his swing, Broad his line and length and Finn his height make for a potent and challenging attack working in tandem.

Credit too must go to David Saker, England’s new bowling coach who is clearly having a real impact on this attack. Though more a coach of people than of their art, Saker encourages his bowlers to think on their feet and work as a unit. Such qualities are likely to appeal to a group of bowlers who are also not short on brain power.

There will be harder days to come, and certainly the debate about whether England should stick with a four or five-man attack will go on. So too is the desire to inject real pace into this attack-probably the missing ingredient, meaning the likes of Ajmal Shahzad and Graham Onions will come into contention.

Though whatever the changes both in shape and personnel, the key for England will be to retain the focus on the bowlers hunting in a pack. Because as Pakistan found out yesterday, England’s bowling attack is at it’s best when working in tandem.